top of page

When the Body Grieves What the Mind Can’t Name

Writer: Stefan Dzeparoski
Stefan Dzeparoski
Sep 20
3 min read

In 2016, I directed Conor McPherson’s adaptation of The Birds at 59E59 Theatres in New York.

Somewhere in the middle of the process — I couldn’t tell you the exact day — I noticed the actors weren’t just rehearsing anymore. They were performing something closer to a ritual. And so was I.

It took me longer than it should have to name what was happening. I wasn’t directing a play about a world under siege from an unexplained, implacable threat. I was building a ritual of mourning. I wasn’t mourning a person. I was mourning a version of the world I’d assumed my own future would still recognize. It was an election year, and something in the air outside that rehearsal room had already started to feel unrecognizable, months before anyone could agree on what to call it.

We never named it grief. We called it “tone,” “atmosphere,” “finding the stakes.” The body knew before the language caught up.

This is collective grief — the kind with no funeral, no obituary, no single loss you can point to. It doesn’t announce itself the way personal grief does. It arrives as an actor who can’t explain why a scene suddenly feels unbearable to run. As a director who keeps extending a tech note past the point it’s

useful, because something in the room needs more time and he doesn’t know what to call it. The mind wants a cause. The body has already moved on to processing.

Grotowski built his discipline around a related premise: the actor’s task isn’t to add technique, but to strip away what blocks the body from expressing what’s already true inside it. He called it via negativa — not acquisition, but removal of obstacle. Long before an actor can tell you what they feel about the state of the world, their body is already holding it. Sometimes for the length of an entire

production, the way mine held that grief for months without a name.

This is where breath becomes diagnostic rather than decorative. In that rehearsal room, I remember one actor whose breath would catch — not dramatically, just a small hitch — every time she reached a particular line about waiting for something that wasn’t coming. She didn’t know why. I didn’t push her to explain it. We just worked the breath itself: lengthened the exhale, let the hitch happen without editing it out. Within a few sessions, the line stopped costing her anything to say — not because she’d

resolved the feeling, but because her body had finally been allowed to complete something it had been holding mid-motion.

That’s the practice, in miniature. Not performing the grief, and not explaining it away either — explanation is usually the mind trying to regain control of something it was never going to fully hold.

Instead: let the body finish the motion it already started. Breathe into the catch. Let it move if it wants to move. Let it be abstract and real at the same time, without demanding it resolve into one or the other.

The production closed that fall. The grief didn’t close with it. I carried it out of that room the same way the actors carried it out of their bodies each night and back in the next day — not resolved, just given somewhere regular to go. A rehearsal room, it turns out, can hold what a person alone can’t.

Collective grief doesn’t stop arriving. Another generation, another unraveling, someone else’s

children and the world we’re not sure they’ll inherit. I don’t think the work is to make peace with that.

I think it’s simpler and harder than that: to keep training the body to register what’s true, even when — especially when — we can’t yet say what it is.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page